(ii) such other matters in the said Lists as, with the concurrence of the Government of the State, the President may by order specify.
Explanation: For the purpose of this article, the Government of the State means the person for the time being recognized by the President on the recommendation of the Legislative Assembly of the State as the Sadr-i-Riyasat (now Governor) of Jammu and Kashmir, acting on the advice of the Council of Ministers of the State for the time being in office.
(c) the provisions of article 1 and of this article shall apply in relation to that State;
(d) such of the other provisions of this Constitution shall apply in relation to that State subject to such exceptions and modifications as the President may by order specify:
Provided that no such order which relates to the matters specified in the Instrument of Accession of the State referred to in paragraph (i) of sub-clause (b) shall be issued except in consultation with the Government of the State:
Provided further that no such order which relates to matters other than those referred to in the last preceding proviso shall be issued except with the concurrence of that Government.
(2)If the concurrence of the Government of the State referred to in paragraph (ii) of sub-clause (b) of clause (1) or in the second provision to sub-clause (d) of that clause be given before the Constituent Assembly for the purpose of framing the Constitution of the State is convened, it shall be placed before such Assembly for such decision as it may take thereon.
(3)Notwithstanding anything in the foregoing provisions of this article, the President may, by public notification, declare that this article shall cease to be operative or shall be operative only with such exceptions and modifications and from such date as he may specify: Provided that the recommendation of the Constituent Assembly of the State referred to in clause (2) shall be necessary before the President issues such a notification.
Analysis of Article 370 (1)
Article 370(1) in itself gives overriding effect to constitution of India. However, the Clause a , b , c and d are worth to look into in order to understand the true depth of its meaning.
Clause a states that Article 238 not applicable to the state of J&K
Clause b provides Power of Parliament to make laws for state of J&K. However, Clause b is not an absolute Provision in itself and clause b(i) and clause b(ii) require Parliament to get concurrence or consultation of Government of State of J&K. Thus, it means that the Parliament is not Powerless to make laws on matters listed in Union list & concurrent list for State of J&K. However, such a Power is subject to Concurrence or Consultation of Government of J&K.
Clause c made Article 1 of constitution of India applicable to State of J&K.
Clause d is very important to understand. Clause d can be said as residual Power of Parliament to make laws for state of J&K. However, Clause d is also not an absolute Provision and subject to two proviso. The Proviso I to clause d make its reference to Power of Parliament under Clause b (i) and Proviso II seem like covering the matters other than those of clause b(i).
Analysis of Article 370(2)
Article 370(2) somewhere conclude and repeat the mandate of Article 370(1). It briefly states that the Concurrence of State of J&K require for giving effect the Clause b(ii) or 2nd Proviso to Article 370(1)(d).
Analysis of Article 370(3)
Article 370(3) is key Provision of this Article. It empower the President by order to either make Entire Article 370 as inoperative or to make it Operative with some exceptions and modifications. However, again to pass any order under Article 370(3), the recommendation of constitution assembly of state of J&K is required which is Practically not possible because the constitution assembly for State of J&K has dissolved long back in 1950.
What Exactly we understood?
So, the Position is
However, the Other Articles can be made applicable to state of J&K only by two ways,
Through concurrence/ consultation of Government of J&K – If Subject is of instrument of accession.
Through only Concurrence of Government of J&K – If Subject is not of instrument of accession.
So Practically Article 370 cannot be scrapped because Article 370(3) require the President Order on recommendation of Constitution assembly of J&K which has been dissolved way earlier.
So, What exactly happened on 05th August 2019 ?
Knowing that the Article 370(3) Order cannot be passed without recommendation of Constitution assembly of J&K. Thus, the President has passed an order Article 370(1)(d) to amend Article 367 by adding clause 4 to Article 367.
What is Article 367 ?
Article 367 is outline certain guidelines to interpret the constitution of India. Article 367(4) added by President Order under Article 370(1)(d).
It has added that the:
Any reference made to Government of State of J&K or Sadar-i-Riyast shall mean a reference to Governor of State of J&K.
Impact – The Parliament/ President now would required the consent of governor of state of J&K instead of earlier requirement of that of Legislative assembly.
Any reference to Constitution assembly under Article 370(3) shall mean a reference to legislative assembly of J&K.
Impact- President in order to scrap or to modify Article 370, need the consent of Legislative assembly for State of J&K. This change has now delete the Practical impossibility to scrap Article 370 by President Order.
What we understood?
So, the President has passed an order under Article 370(1)(d) to amend Article 367 by introducing Article 367(4). But to apply Article 370(1)(d) , we know that the concurrence of Government of J&K required.
Since, the State of J&K is under President rule. Hence, it is deemed that the concurrence of Governor of State of J&K obtained. So due to President Rule in J&K , it become easier to dodge away the Concurrence Condition under Article 370(1)(d).
Article 370 is not scrapped since no order has been passed under Article 370(3). However, by virtue of President order under Article 370(1)(d), the President by amended Article 367 has made the Article 370 as meaningless in indirect way.
Thus, now the Parliament can make laws for matters as refereed under Article 370 by more easier and convenient way just by getting consent of Governor of State of J&K. (earlier which was dependent upon whims & mercies of Legislative assembly of J&K)
E.g.- J&K state reorganization bill, 2019 to bifurcate it into UT of J&K with legislative assembly and UT of Ladakh without Legislative assembly, is evident of Parliament Power to make laws easier for J&K.
However, to Scrap the Article 370 in totality, the consent of Legislative assembly of J&K is still required. (as mandate of Article 370(1)(d)).
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any agency of the Indian government. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world analytic products as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of any Indian government State.
The author is company secretary by qualification and is undergoing its management trainee with a reputed corporate law firm. Further, he is a Second Year Law student at faculty of law, University of Delhi. He is also enrolled as Para Legal volunteer with Delhi State Legal Service authority and also active Participant in Moot Court.
The entire contents of this article are solely for information purpose and have been prepared on the basis of relevant provisions and as per the information existing at the time of the preparation by the Author. Compliance Calendar LLP and the Author of this Article do not constitute any sort of professional advice or a formal recommendation. The author has undertaken utmost care to disseminate the true and correct view and doesn’t accept liability for any errors or omissions. You are kindly requested to verify and confirm the updates from the genuine sources before acting on any of the information’s provided hereinabove. Compliance Calendar LLP shall not be responsible for any loss or damage in any circumstances whatsoever.